Teams start looking for Quantive Results alternatives when pricing grows faster than the value they extract, key features require expensive plan upgrades, or the tool's architecture doesn't fit how the team actually works. Quantive Results is a capable tool in its category, but every software choice involves trade-offs — and as teams grow, requirements evolve in ways the original tool wasn't designed for. The right replacement is usually not the tool with the longest feature list; it is the one that preserves your current workflow while changing the constraint that made Quantive Results frustrating. Use the alternatives below to compare pricing model, deployment control, migration effort, and the specific tradeoffs between Lattice, 15Five, Weekdone.
Who should switch from Quantive Results
- You're evaluating Quantive Results but haven't committed — Perdoo offers a free tier covering the core workflow so you can compare on real data before spending.
- You're on a Quantive Results plan primarily for one or two features — a focused alternative covers your real use case at a lower tier price.
- Your team's okr software needs have evolved since you first chose Quantive Results — re-evaluating the category with current pricing is worth an afternoon.
Quantive Results alternatives compared
| Tool | Best for | Free plan | Starting price | Open source | Key differentiator |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lattice | Lattice for okr software teams | Trial only | Demo pricing | No | Lattice is proprietary, starts at pricing on request, and runs as managed SaaS. |
| 15Five | 15Five for okr software teams | No | $4/mo | No | 15Five is proprietary, starts at $4/month, and runs as managed SaaS. |
| Weekdone | Weekdone for okr software teams | Trial only | Demo pricing | No | Weekdone is proprietary, starts at pricing on request, and runs as managed SaaS. |
| Perdoo | Perdoo for okr software teams | Yes | Free | No | Perdoo is proprietary, starts at free, and runs as managed SaaS. |
| WorkBoard | WorkBoard for okr software teams | Trial only | Demo pricing | No | WorkBoard is proprietary, starts at pricing on request, and runs as managed SaaS. |
Lattice — Best Quantive Results Alternative for Enterprise Teams Needing Advanced Governance
Lattice targets the enterprise segment with governance, compliance, and audit features that go beyond Quantive Results's mid-market positioning. SSO, SCIM provisioning, role-based access, and dedicated support SLAs are standard rather than expensive add-ons. For teams in regulated industries or with security review requirements, the additional structure justifies the premium.
Pricing: Lattice starts at pricing on request; Quantive Results starts at pricing on request. Lattice is paid-only and Quantive Results is paid-only. At comparable feature tiers, check both annual and monthly billing — annual discounts of 20–30% are standard across both.
Best for: Mid-market and enterprise buyers with procurement, security review, and compliance requirements.
The catch: Enterprise pricing is opaque and typically requires a demo and negotiation — you won't find a self-serve signup with predictable per-seat cost.
15Five — Best Quantive Results Alternative for Non-Technical Users Who Need Fast Onboarding
15Five strips away the configuration depth that makes Quantive Results powerful but slow to adopt. The narrower feature set means faster onboarding and less ongoing admin burden — teams that struggled to get consistent adoption on Quantive Results often find 15Five sticks. The trade-off is real: you'll hit limits as complexity grows, but that's often years away.
Pricing: 15Five starts at $4/month; Quantive Results starts at pricing on request. 15Five is paid-only and Quantive Results is paid-only. At comparable feature tiers, check both annual and monthly billing — annual discounts of 20–30% are standard across both.
Best for: Non-technical users and small teams who need the core job done without configuration overhead.
The catch: The simplicity ceiling is also a feature ceiling — teams with complex workflows will eventually hit limits that force a move back to a more configurable tool.
Weekdone — Best Quantive Results Alternative for Organizations Reducing Single-Vendor Dependency
Weekdone is frequently chosen by teams actively migrating away from Quantive Results. The data import tools, migration guides, and feature mapping make the transition more straightforward than building a case for a greenfield tool. Many teams run both in parallel during transition — Weekdone's pricing accommodates this without penalty.
Pricing: Weekdone starts at pricing on request; Quantive Results starts at pricing on request. Weekdone is paid-only and Quantive Results is paid-only. At comparable feature tiers, check both annual and monthly billing — annual discounts of 20–30% are standard across both.
Best for: Teams in the Okr Software space that have evaluated the category and want a Weekdone-first workflow.
The catch: Weekdone's integration catalog is smaller than Quantive Results's, which may require additional middleware or Zapier connections for niche tools.
Perdoo — Best Quantive Results Alternative for Teams That Need a Functional Free Tier
Perdoo offers a functional free tier that covers what most small teams actually need from Quantive Results's paid plan. You can evaluate real usage without committing to an annual contract. The paid upgrade path exists, but many teams stay on the free plan indefinitely.
Pricing: Perdoo starts at free; Quantive Results starts at pricing on request. Perdoo has a free plan and Quantive Results is paid-only. At comparable feature tiers, check both annual and monthly billing — annual discounts of 20–30% are standard across both.
Best for: Early-stage startups, bootstrapped founders, and small teams evaluating Okr Software tools before committing to a paid plan.
The catch: The paid upgrade path can be steep — free tier limits are intentionally tight to encourage conversion, and the jump to the first paid plan is often abrupt.
WorkBoard — Best Quantive Results Alternative for Budget-First Buyers Evaluating Options
WorkBoard delivers the core Quantive Results workflow at pricing on request — meaningfully cheaper than Quantive Results's pricing on request starting point. The feature set is slightly narrower, which is exactly what teams paying for Quantive Results capabilities they don't use should expect. The savings compound: over 12 months, the difference often covers a meaningful addition to the stack.
Pricing: WorkBoard starts at pricing on request; Quantive Results starts at pricing on request. WorkBoard is paid-only and Quantive Results is paid-only. At comparable feature tiers, check both annual and monthly billing — annual discounts of 20–30% are standard across both.
Best for: Cost-conscious SMBs and seed-stage startups watching software spend as a percentage of revenue.
The catch: The feature gap versus Quantive Results is real at the equivalent tier — power users migrating from Quantive Results will hit limits that require workflow changes.
How to choose your Quantive Results alternative
- Which specific features do you use daily versus which are included in your plan but rarely touched? Focused alternatives often serve core needs at lower cost.
- Does the pricing model match how your usage grows — per-seat, per-volume, or flat rate? Pricing misalignment compounds as your team or usage scales.
- Is self-hosting or open-source auditability required? Many categories have strong open-source alternatives that eliminate subscription costs at the cost of operational overhead.
Frequently asked questions
Several alternatives offer free tiers or open-source versions. The right free option depends on which features you use most — free tiers typically cap users, volume, or automation. For a fair comparison, price Quantive Results against the exact workflow you use weekly, not the whole feature checklist. Lattice is listed at pricing on request, while 15Five is listed at $4/month; Quantive Results is listed at pricing on request.
Pricing in this category varies significantly. Newer entrants often undercut incumbents to gain market share. Open-source self-hosted tools eliminate subscription costs entirely, trading them for operational overhead. For a fair comparison, price Quantive Results against the exact workflow you use weekly, not the whole feature checklist. Lattice is listed at pricing on request, while 15Five is listed at $4/month; Quantive Results is listed at pricing on request.
Most SaaS tools export data as CSV or JSON. Integrations, automations, and custom configurations typically don't transfer and require manual recreation in the new tool. For a fair comparison, price Quantive Results against the exact workflow you use weekly, not the whole feature checklist. Lattice is listed at pricing on request, while 15Five is listed at $4/month; Quantive Results is listed at pricing on request.
Quantive Results is worth paying for if you actively use the features your tier includes. The value erodes when you're on a tier primarily for one or two capabilities the tool bundles with many others. For a fair comparison, price Quantive Results against the exact workflow you use weekly, not the whole feature checklist.
About Quantive Results
Strategy execution and OKRs